Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype
Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype content material (on warmth and competence dimensions) influences subsequent target evaluation following selfthreat associated with one’s competence. Participants initially received threatening or nonthreatening feedback on their competence. They evaluated then a job candidate who was stereotyped either as competent and cold (Asian) or as warm and incompetent (functioning mother). As predicted, threatened participants derogated only the Asian target on her perceived warmth and her suitability to get a job, but didn’t derogate the working mother. Furthermore, perceived warmth mediated the observed variations in the evaluation from the targets’ job suitability. These benefits extend research on selfthreat and prejudice by like Stereotype Content Model within this link.Keywords and phrases Selfthreat; Motivation; Stereotyping; Stereotypecontent People’s motivation to retain a optimistic selfimage has been shown to lead to damaging evaluations of stereotyped targets. Although men and women differ in their chronic motivation to maintain a positive selfimage, specific events that threaten one’s good selfimage can activate this motivation. Selfthreat decreases selfesteem (Baumeister Tice, 985) and consequently, men and women engage in tactics to restore their selfesteem and positive selfimage. Fein and Spencer (997) showed that one of these approaches involves derogating members of stereotyped group. That’s, selfthreat increases negative evaluation of stereotyped targets. These authors initially gave participants false adverse (i.e. selfthreatening) or good feedback on an alleged I.Q. test. Participants then evaluated a job candidate who was either Jewish (i.e JAP: “Jewish American Princess”) or Italian. Final results showed that following selfthreat, participants evaluated the Jewish candidate much more negatively than the Italian candidate. This impact was not located following constructive feedback. Even though each of those targets are members of stereotyped outgroups, only the Jewish target was derogated. We recommend that not all (stereotyped) targets are acceptable to satisfy one’s motivation to restore a positive selfimage following a threat. In line with Fein and Spencer, only negatively stereotyped targets (e.g JAP, homosexuals) are probably to be derogated following selfthreat. As these authors argued, the JAP stereotype is globally speaking additional adverse than the Italian stereotype. Hence, negative stereotypes may well justify the unfavorable evaluation of targets (Kunda Spencer, 2003). Nevertheless, as proposed by the Stereotype Content material Model (SCM, Fiske, Cuddy, Glick Xu, 2002; Fiske, Xu, Cuddy Glick, 999), quite a few outgroups are the objects of adverse stereotyping, but not for precisely the same reason. The current operate aims to refine the selfthreat stereotype hyperlink by which includes the target stereotype content material. This PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361489 research will also refine the SCM by displaying that distinct kinds of selfthreat motivate differential usage in the stereotype content dimensions.NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author ManuscriptStereotype Content material ModelFiske et al.’s (2002) operate revealed that stereotype content purchase F 11440 varies along two most important dimensions: Competence and warmth. Perceived levels of competence and warmth indicate to what extent a group is respected and liked, respectively. Two most important sorts of mixed stereotypes can thus be derived: Paternalistic stereotypes include groups perceived as warm but not competent (e.g housewiv.